Benchmarks: Equally SSD Benchmark

The Every bit SSD Benchmark sequential read results tell a different story to what was seen when testing with CrystalDiskMark. Here the Intel SSD 750 Series smashes the 2GB/s barrier, hitting 2.2GB/s and leaving the Samsung SM951 well backside. That said, the SM951 still managed to reach i.9GB/s while the G.Skill Phoenix Blade topped out at just over 1.7GB/southward.

The Kingston Predator delivered the same sequential read functioning in Every bit SSD Benchmark as it did when testing with CrystalDiskMark. This was besides true for the Plextor PX-G512M6e and the SATA SSDs.

Despite the huge performance variation betwixt As SSD Benchmark and CrystalDiskMark when measuring sequential read performance the write results seem to align.

Due to the Intel SSD 750 Series support for NVMe, it tin can't exist beaten in the 4K-64 thread test delivering a whopping one.28GB/due south. In comparison, the Samsung SM951 reached just 686MB/south though the Chiliad.Skill Phoenix Blade did quite well reaching 774MB/due south.

The 4K-64 thread write operation was much more competitive and hither the One thousand.Skill Phoenix Bract PCIe SSD came out on top narrowly defeating the Intel SSD 750 Series. Here you will notice that the Samsung SM951 doesn't offering much of a performance advantage over the SATA SSDs.

The Intel SSD 750 Series features the best read admission time though the results are comparable with the Plextor PX-G512M6e and Samsung SSD 850 Pro. The only SSDs to actually deliver weak results here included the 1000.Skill Phoenix Blade, Crucial MX200, BX100 and Kingston HyperX Savage. The Kingston HyperX Barbarous was particularly bad and 0.302ms is the worst access time we recall seeing for an SSD.

Despite the terrible read access time operation the Kingston HyperX Savage was rather snappy when measuring write admission time. Still it was the Intel SSD 750 Series that dominated here followed past the Samsung SSD 850 Pro.